I have a memory of being a wobbly little girl
and tracing the curve of a smile
on the face of someone I loved.
I don’t know whose face
whose smile
or if it even happened.
But I see it clearly in my mind
upturned mouth, wrinkly crinkly eyes
someone smiling at me saying,
“This is how people who see
know that I am happy. I’m happy because of you.
I’m smiling because you’re here.”
So I learned to emulate that upslanted mouth
the open face of a person happy for the presence of another
even though I’ve never seen it with my eyes.
I know a smile by a voice
maybe giddy around the edges
always warm throughout
I know a smile by a body
relaxed and loose limbed
anticipating laughter.
I know a smile by a sigh
full-bodied or muffled behind a beloved hand
contentment.
I guess my smiles are less open now
less free for the taking
I don’t smile just because some man on the street says I should
and especially if he says I’ll look prettier.
I fake-smile at people
who want to pet my dog
when I’m in a hurry.
I half-smile when someone holds the door
or steps out of my way.
I can always tell
when my eyes don’t crinkle
that it isn’t real.
For most pictures, I hope someone will tell a joke
just before the flash
so that I’ll be preserved happy.
For some pictures, I’m already smiling
before I even have time to worry.
I can smile without sight
Not only because someone showed me how
but also because life has kept me practicing.
Those moments when my face opens like an outstretched hand
inviting joy
sharing mirth
loving you
Those are the happiest moments I’m alive.
Asides
It’s finals week, and after it is over I will be done at NILA and NILA will, soon, sooner than anyone wants, close its doors for good. I, in a final tribute of probable stupidity, have decided to write my last paper, a compare-and-contrast behemoth, on three essay collections: Meagan Daum’s The Unspeakable, Leslie Jamison’s Empathy Exams, and Rebecca Solnit’s Men Explain Things to Me. I’ve been reading these collections over again in spurts and fits, little bits here and there, skipping ahead, going back to reread the best parts, my text full of the little “hl`s (for highlight) crowding every page. I’m writing about the stance all three of these writers take of speaking uncomfortable things, that each, in her own way and through her own prose, teases and sometimes tears at the walls we build around ourselves so that we won’t have to squirm. Jamison speaks of empathy, of people with afflictions the medical community have never wholly acknowledged or validated finding and comforting each other, of the pain that we may actually want to feel but are too shamed or closed to explore. Daum writes about her chagrin at dating people so she can write about them, her ambivalence about having children, and her coming to terms with being put in a medically induced coma, nearly dying, and having nothing more profound to say about it than, “I’m glad that’s over.” Because, you know, near death is supposed to inspire us, or, at the very least, force us to start believing in god. And Solnit, with her blunt dissection of why society has been afraid of marriage equality, her eloquent essay about Virginia Woolf and embracing darkness and the unknown, and her fierce assertion that women deserve and desperately need to be witnesses to their own lives and stories, and how we still have far to go to fully celebrate that.
I love these writers and these essays, not because I agree with all of them, but because they dare to go to places that are visceral, they dare to speak about vulnerability and fear and force me to think and question my own biases, and oh there are so many.
In rereading these essays, I’ve thought about how I’d read them at the beginning of the semester versus how I read them now, with the knowledge that we will all say good-bye and scatter soon. These three women are providing me so much comfort and healing through their words, their strong voices, their tenacity in writing, no matter what else there is or isn’t. I feel like I know them, and forget that I only know them through pages and words and attributing their feelings to mine. When I read Daum for the first time, I was furious with her; you know how the things you hate about someone else are the things that glare back at you in your own reflection? The first time I read Jamison, it was the week following the Nila announcement and I felt raw like someone had broken my heart. When I first read the Solnit essay on Woolf, it annoyed me because it seemed like all she was doing was using the essay as an excuse to plug all her other books. Yet, now, I’m reading with fresh eyes, with fresh enthusiasm and love for the these women I don’t know, for the inspiration and hope that if my voice can be half as true as theirs, I’ll have accomplished a writing miracle.
To be honest, there’s been a lot of crying over the rereading. Some bad crying, but mostly good, tears of relief, of finding solace here. I walked the mile to the bus in the drizzle of a gray afternoon, thinking of words and ideas and hope, and listening to the seagulls calling somewhere over there, and smelling wet green grass and mulchy earth. These gray days are perfect writing and reading days for me, and I want to hold on to this one for a while.
Before I get back to it, I want to leave with a quote from the afore mentioned Woolf essay, “Woolf’s Darkness: Embracing the Inexplicable.” Solnit begins with a quote from Woolf herself: “The future is dark, which is the best thing the future can be, I think.” Lovely and true and hopeful, but the best comes from Solnit herself, later in the essay, and this is what I want to remember.
“Despair is a form of certainty, certainty that the future will be a lot like the present or will decline from it; despair is a confident memory of the future… Optimism is similarly confident about what will happen. Both are grounds for not acting. Hope can be the knowledge that we don’t have that memory and that reality doesn’t necessarily match our plans.”
When I was a kid, my classmates thought it was the best thing ever to come up to me and ask, “Do you know who I am? Do you recognize my voice? Guess who?” It was especially awesome, I think, because they didn’t even have to cover my eyes. They could just ask and, depending on my answer, either be impressed that I remembered their voice or scornful that I didn’t. Wasn’t I supposed to be exceptional in my voice recognition skills? In all honesty, I’m pretty sure my recognition was about 50 50. I’m not Daredevil, or any other “inspirational” blind fictional character, and I can’t remember a voice I’ve only heard a few times or haven’t heard in years.
This might seem like a little kid harmless thing, and mostly, it was, though it persisted well into high school. By then, the “guess who?” among my friends came accompanied by poking, tickling, and other physical contact as code. Code for, “We’re teenagers, and this is what we do.” Looking back now, I’m sure it was just a form of nonvisual communication and, likely, affection. This was what replaced eye contact, or a smile across a crowded room, or a mouthed greeting in class. Instead of those things, I got anonymous hugs from behind, pokes in the ribs, tickles under my chin. And, always, “Do you know who I am? Guess who?”
I’ve been thinking about this lately because it has happened a few times in the last weeks. As an adult, I am still being asked to play “guess who” and frankly, I think it’s ridiculous. There’s a twist, though: this has also morphed into, “guess where?” “Let’s see if you remember where this is,” someone will say. “Let’s test you and see if you can do this.”
I have a lot to say about these “tests” of my memory and ability to be Blind Superperson. Mostly, though, I just want to say, “Stop it. Like, immediately.” This is not fun any more. I am not a child any more. Poking and prodding and tickling isn’t cute any more.
I’ve been trying to think about WHY it seems acceptable to some sighted people to engage this way with blind people. I’ve come up with one theory, that it’s a way to communicate for people who are awkward around blindness. They can’t make eye contact with me, or smile with recognition, and they also can’t think much past Blind and Sighted, so they try to find humor and connection in those feelings of insecurity by putting me through a “test.” Instead of just asking a question: “How would you like me to let you know who I am? Should I remind you of my name?” Specific asking takes away the guesswork; the sighted person doesn’t have to assume the other person knows who they are, and also doesn’t have to keep identifying themselves over and over if it’s unnecessary and just annoying.
Yet, outright asking seems to be one of the hardest things to do. Outright asking is acknowledging difference, having to talk about it openly, and admitting that you don’t know what the best way forward should be. That’s a vulnerable place to be in, I suppose, and for me, it explains why even some adults revert to the elementary school “guess who” when they are reacquainted with me. I’d much rather just be told and not tested.
The other part of “guess who”, of course, is the being touched. I don’t mind being touched by people who know me well, and I don’t even mind being touched by strangers too much. What I do mind is the assumption that because I am blind and that, in some people’s minds, makes me vulnerable, it is ok to touch me without consent. When someone comes out of the blue and hugs or pokes or tickles me, it could be a complete stranger or someone I know, but I have no way of knowing which. Since I’ve become a city dweller and am on the streets every day, I’m much more wary of this than I was as a kid or a teenager. So, I’d rather not be touched without knowing who is touching me.
Of course, as with everything, different blind people have different feelings on this. But these are mine and, as ever, only mine. I’d love to hope that “guess who” will soon be part of a bygone era of my life.
Last summer, I deactivated my Facebook account for my 30th birthday. It was the best. It had gotten to a point where social media was way too stressful and anxiety-inducing and PRECIOUS for me. I was tired of looking at people’s curated, (and I suspect sometimes fake), lives. It wasn’t about anyone in particular at all. I love my friends and family. It was about minimizing anxiety, and my own sense of “failing” at the life I felt was expected of me, and it was about practicing authenticity. (It’s always a practice.)
Now, I’m back on Facebook for a few important reasons, for the moment. I reserve the right to quit again, as we all do. But I’m still looking for authenticity, for vulnerability and honesty, and it’s occurred to me that I might as well start with me.
I’ve noticed a pattern in myself, where the more depressed I am, the more I’m looking for validation, posting on Facebook like everything is amazing. Of course, this is not always the case. You shouldn’t assume that if I’m posting a lot, I’m doing so while listening to Tori Amos and crying into my teacup. But, it is something that I do: when my outside life feels overwhelming, I’m on the Internet, wanting superfluous talk and distraction. Sometimes, I’m posting about my big plans for the future, my cooking projects, my feminist and activist ideals. Blahblahblah. And other timestimes, it’s totally legitimate and I really am making a three-layer carrot cake with extra-creamy cream cheese frosting and loving every minute of it. But sometimes, it’s teatime with Tori.
I’ve decided that this is probably ok, and that I don’t need to stress over it too much, especially when I’m already stressed. But it does beg the question: what can I do to intentionally be more authentic? And where? And how? And my blog seems like the obvious place, the space where I can be real with you, and you can read it, or not. You get to decide.
This post on authenticity was also inspired by my blog post last week. It was not a happy post in the slightest, and I know it’s natural to worry, and worrying is ok. But the post was less about wanting to cause worry and more about practicing that authenticity, vulnerability, and honesty. I can’t make carrot cake all the time. It’s been a very challenging couple of months for me. I’d like to say it’s getting better, but I’d also like to not fake it, so it’s really not getting better. I have good days and bad days and I’m trying to be ok with the fact that, at least for a little while longer, things are just gonna be hard. I hope you’ll stick with me through my possibly sad, but striving for authentic posts, but it’s ok if they’re too much: too personal, too sad, too bleak. I get it.
And thank you, as always, for being here. Thank you for reading these words, no matter how uncomfortable they might be.
At some point you get some crazy idea to move away
look for a new home, look for a new life
laugh and eat and breathe somewhere else
because dammit, you just want to.
Because it’s an adventure, because it’s time
And then when you do, life goes on back there without you
the place you left
and even though you want to return, it doesn’t stop to wait for you.
No, it’s too busy with new things
you’re old, you’ve been there before, you’ve loved there before, you’ve failed there before.
That place moves on, even though you can’t
even though you want to try to take it back
because you changed your mind you made a mistake you didn’t mean to
you just want to be held
not to go to bed alone
not to lie awake alone
but it’s just not the same back there and it will never be
Life changes, even if you haven’t.
Or even if you have, in the worst possible ways.
Last summer, I signed up for a CSA from Oxbow Farm in Carnation, Washington. It brought things I’ve never seen in a CSA: fava beans, rhubarb, fresh coriander seed, radicchio. Suddenly, I realized what the fuss was about. Every other CSA I’ve gotten always bragged that it would give you access to “veggies you’ve never even heard of.” Not to brag myself, but I’ve been eating kale for a decade, people, way before it was cool. I don’t need a CSA to teach me the ways of the butternut or collard. But this CSA, this quintessentially Northwest box that might include sour cherries one week, dragon tongue beans the next, gave me many new cooking projects for my money. Of course, there was the normal glut of summer squash and cucumbers, which is great when they first show up on Week 4 and totally maddening and soul-crushing by Week 12, but no CSA is perfect.
I was preparing to mourn the loss of this season’s Northwest bounty because of my impending move, but received an email last week informing me that crops were growing and I could have an early-season box by next Friday. Rhubarb, chard, little potatoes, shallots and chives, (which will be given away, due to my hatred of anything onion-y). I couldn’t believe I could have rhubarb already. I thought of jam and pie and coffee cake. I thought of tiny summer strawberries and tender asparagus. Not long now.
Maybe it will motivate me to plant some more seeds. I should probably never have stopped.
I am so grateful that spring comes earlier here. Even more because it will be my last early spring, at least for a while, and I’m happy to have a few more CSA boxes before I leave. I’d like to think I’ll be back someday. At least for a while.
Tonight, I ran out to get my mail and on my way back, I met a man I didn’t know, with a southern accent and a firm handshake, who said he’d been living in 102 since November. I felt mildly guilty, as I usually do, that I had no idea he had moved in, that I wish I knew my neighbors more, enough to ask them to bring in my mail or water my plants when I’m gone, enough that they would ask me the same. I was about to let the guilt go and move on, when the man, who introduced himself as Paul, said he was the brother of David, a neighbor I had gotten to know over the past year.
David had Parkinson’s disease and sometimes had seizures. On his better days, he liked to hang out in the hallway with his door open, or hang around the back door, saying hello to everyone who walked by, again and again, even if he said it to the same person every five minutes. Once, I’d come upon him when he was upset and crying, and we talked about what it was like to be different, to be “people with disabilities” living in the world, and I found comfort in our conversation. I wrote an essay about it. It’d been months since I’d seen David anywhere, and had hoped fervently that he’d gone home to D.C., or maybe he’d moved into assisted living or something. Every once in a while, I thought I should ask my landlord about him, but I hadn’t seen my landlord around lately either.
I’m so glad I ran into Paul, and that he didn’t let me duck into my apartment without talking to him. (I tried.) He told me that David had died in January, after being in the hospital for a few months. Paul had moved into tie up David’s “affairs”, and is leaving to go back to Virginia tomorrow. I’m so glad I hadn’t missed him.
Paul also told me that my landlord, Marvin, had also died in February. I had said, “I wanted to ask Marvin about David, you know, since I hadn’t seen him, but I haven’t seen Marvin lately either.” I remember I kind of smiled, like, you know Marvin, he’s everywhere. And Paul said, “Marvin died too.”
I couldn’t get my head around it, these two neighbors, who lived across the hall from one another, one landlord, one tenant, both the life of the building, the only two I knew and who consistently greeted me with warmth, both dying within a month of each other. So much loss, so easy for me, as I immediately did, to feel guilty about not knowing, to think, “I wish I would’ve known, I could have helped maybe.” But what could I have done? I wished I had been friendlier, enough that I would have met Paul sooner, or sent my condolences to Marvin’s wife, or something. My brain, as it does, worked hard in those moments with Paul to figure out what I could DO. How could I make my past apathy better?
But I couldn’t, and I can’t, and it’s not about me.
Paul asked me to share memories of David. I struggled with whether to tell him about the essay I’d written, how I was shopping it around, trying to get someone to publish it. I wasn’t sure he’d like that I’d written about his brother. I decided to just tell Paul how welcoming David had been when I moved in, have: he was the friendliest, steadiest person in this building, how in my moments of homesickness, I appreciated it so much.
Paul said he was sorry to be the barer of doubly bad news. I felt wrenched that he was apologizing to me when his brother had died. He said he would tape a piece of paper to my door with information about David’s obituary, if I’d like to read it. I said I would, didn’t bother to tell him I couldn’t read the paper. I asked him if I could give him a hug, and remembered that after our conversation where I’d found him crying, I’d hugged David too. He seemed so thin. Paul was more wirey than thin, but strong, intent on holding me up, even though he didn’t have to, even though I should have been doing that for him.
Tonight, I’m winging a thread of hope to the universe, that Paul will have a long, happy life. And that he knows that David will always be a fixture in my memories of this place and of Seattle.
It’s hard to not feel as though I’ve failed. I wanted to take a risk, to have an adventure, and I honestly did not think I would look back much. I hoped I wouldn’t? I often wonder what was wrong with what I had, why I left in the first place, and the “wrongness” wasn’t so wrong as it was the same, and I felt the same, and I wanted to feel different, to stretch myself. And, if that were everything, I have, definitely, stretched.
I wanted a writing community. I got that. Now it is faltering, broken, unsteady. I hope, as we scatter, it will rebuild and remain strong.
I got a taste of wet, snowless winters, lavender growing all year, wild, thorny bushes, flowers blooming in February. There is also lavender everything: macaroons, lattes, hot chocolate, cookies, ice cream. There’s the scent crushed from the buds under my feet. God I will miss the lavender.
I found food here: so much food. I could eat for days: lavain and dumplings and pain au chocolat and slurpy noodles and jolting espresso. I learned to love an Americano, something I thought was always too bitter for me. Now I drink it like it’s holy.
I found air that always smells so green and alive. Knowing there is always growing gives me a hope I never experienced in snow, which nothing seemed to live through. I just barely did.
I found a place, a city, that I love, that it hurts me to leave. Seattle carried so much want and need and hope. I even found a few people whom I love very much.
I guess what I didn’t find (yet) is community: that all-enveloping support from all sides, the years that are put in to friendships and intentional space. I could probably get it here, eventually. After years. But, why wait when I already have it, when I can feel the power of it even from here, just from reaching out and saying, “I’m coming home.”
I worry, though. I know that when I return, the first few months will be glory: summer and friends and lakes and re-learning all my places. Then what? When fall and winter come, will I feel just as restless? Will I want to leave? If I leave again, can I ever come back? How many chances do I get in a life?
I’m trying to think of it less as “going back” and more just as “going” and “bringing” and “sharing” the things I’ve learned and “reveling” in the things I’ve missed and “giving” my energy to the people I love and whose love I cherish. I don’t want to return to Minneapolis and try to “forget” Seattle ever happened. At first, I did. After NILA announced its closing, all I wanted was to forget, to pretend I’d never even heard of Whidbey Island. But that would be doing a huge disservice to the NILA community, to this year of growth, to this opportunity I took.
I love Seattle. I am already thinking how I’ll miss it. I love Minneapolis. I’ve already missed it for way too long. Somehow, in some way, there has to be room for both.
My friend Arlie has a t-shirt with a picture of an old-school computer and the phrase: “Computers use to suck” underneath. I would like to fight whoever decided on the “used to.” Because, I am about ready to throw my BrailleNote and my Iphone out the window.
This is a long tale, a veritable slog through the frustration of trying to make computers that supposedly only “used to” suck do the things that they supposedly are designed to do. It is a tale familiar to everyone who has ever tried to do this and failed, so that’s basically everyone, unless you’re the smartest person in the world. (You know who you are.)
This tale begins with my completely radical notion that I would like to be able to type faster than ten words per minute on my Iphone. I thought, hmm, I should get a bluetooth keyboard. Then I remembered way back in my brain that at some point before acquiring my Iphone, I’d read that you could pair it with a BrailleNote. Hark! I thought, (whatever that means), I shall see about doing that instead of spending money on a keyboard that will not only be expensive, but also I’ll have to carry it around and who wants that when I already carry my BrailleNote around everywhere?
Now, I will admit that from the very beginning, I messed up. This is where having a little knowledge is a bad thing. I had already paired many bluetooth devices with my BrailleNote, so I assumed this would be the exact same process. So, I paired from my BrailleNote; my Iphone popped right up. I typed in the stupid, stupid authentication code. Later, you will hear why this code is going to put me in an early grave. Everything seemed to be paired. The BrailleNote actually said, “Iphone, paired.” But nothing else was happening. Which was strange. If I’d done it right, the BrailleNote should now be displaying the apps from my phone.
So, I went to Google. The manufacturer of the BrailleNote, Humanware, provided me a tutorial. It said that I must turn the “braille terminal” from “USB” to “bluetooth.” Okey dokey, that made reasonable sense. So, I did that. Still nothing. I did more Googling. HUMANWare informed meof this: “The BrailleNote Apex and the Iphone, a winning combination!” I was still slightly hopeful, but was definitely anxious for the “winning part.
Oh, good, Here we have “trouble-shooting.” My first mistake was that I needed to set up the pairing through the Iphone, not through the BrailleNote. Oops. And, you don’t set it up through the “bluetooth” menu, which to me makes the most sense. No, you must go to “settings”, “general”, “accessibility”, “voice over”, and THEN “braille”, and hope that your Braille display will show up there. Mine did. When you double tap to pair it, you have about 10 seconds to type in the authentication code before it tells you the pairing is unsuccessful. You may think this is easy, but here’s the thing: the code is 0000. To type it, you must double tap on the 0.” This means you must find the 0 on the number pad, and tap it eight times. One more time than eight and you’re effed. My finger was extra tappy due to the coffee and my annoyance, so I ended up messing up a lot. If you manage to type in the four 0’s, you must then navigate back to the “pair” button which means swiping left through the numbers 1-9, out of the “PIN” box, and then to the “pair” button. Ok, maybe I am just incompetent, but doing this in 10 seconds was giving me all kinds of whiplash. Oh and I forgot, if you don’t succeed at this in three attempts, you must START OVER, which means going back to the bluetooth menu, telling the Iphone to “forget” the BrailleNote, and then go back into the “Braille” menu to search for it again.
I did this approximately 10 thousand times. Nothing. Just the same error message, “Unable to connect to Apex”, with an “ok” button. Or, a few times, “unable to connect to apex. Makes sure it is turned on and within range.” No shit. OR, once or twice, “unable to load Apex driver.” Omgomgomg.
So, now what? The trouble-shooting instructions mention that if you tried to pair with the BrailleNote first, it might still be trying to pair, so do a hard reset. (This effectively restores all factory defaults. The only thing more extreme is a different reset which deletes all your files, from what I can tell.) So, I did that, to no avail. Also, suggested: make sure your BrailleNote name is correct in the “computer name” menu or the Iphone won’t recognize it. All righty, did that. Nothing. Absolutely nothing. Back to feverishly typing in the authentication code: (what in the Goddess’s name is this for, anyway? It’s not a password, because it’s pretty much universal for all bluetooth devices. Just, why?)
Agh, I might have to call tech support. I really, REALLY don’t want to. I have never had anything good happen while calling tech support, except:
a. they tell me I need to learn to follow directions.
B. They ask me if my computer is actually on.
C. They tell me to “send it in”, which takes three months and never costs under 1000 dollars.
All I have to say is, really? Could we make this more complicated and unintuitive? And we’re telling ourselves that computers “used to” suck?
OMG, Sarah, get out of my head. 1 through 3 are, like, the most annoyingthingsever. 4, even though I don’t have to deal with it, sounds like it would annoy me. And if you’ve ever spent time reading my blog, you know I would do anything for a dog-vomit sensor that isn’t my bare feet.
What it really comes down to is assumptions. We could all do well to keep them in check.
Ok, Molly’s is pretty good, too.